SMS Interconnect Fees

An interesting offshoot of my investigation in to Fair Mobile statistics was the discovery that some African operators charge an interconnect fee for SMS messages. Now interconnect fees are a topic of hot debate at the moment here in South Africa.  Interconnection Fees are the charges that operators levy to terminate calls from other operators on their network.  Regulators typically intervene on interconnect fees when they appear to be out of step with the actual costs of interconnection.  Of course the “actual” cost of interconnection is a subject of much debate because it represents both a cost and a source of revenue for operators, the details of which are rarely revealed to anyone by the operators.  Thus they are the subject of much speculation.

Less speculative is the cost to the operator of sending an SMS.  I have written previously on the egregiously high cost of sending SMSes in Africa.  However, to add insult to injury, in at least 17 African countries, operators charge an interconnect fee for connecting with other operators nationally.  In many cases they are doubling even tripling the cost of sending an SMS.  The argument for levying an interconnect charge is based on the need of the operator to recover the costs of terminating a call or in this case an SMS on their network.  But let’s face it, the incremental cost of terminating an SMS on an operator’s network is effectively zero or near enough to zero to as to make no difference.  In many countries, including South Africa, there are no internal interconnect fees for text messages.  So here is a list of the most egregious offenders:

Country Dominant Operator SMS Interconnect Markup
Niger Zain 200%
Uganda MTN 160%
Mauritania Mauritel 150%
Nigeria MTN 114%
Benin MTN(Mascom) 100%
Botswana MTN 100%
Congo Zain 100%
Gabon Zain 100%
Guinea Areeba (MTN) 100%
Mali Orange 100%
Rwanda MTN 77%
Senegal Orange 50%
Algeria Djezzy (Orascom) 43%
Kenya Safaricom 43%
Zambia MTN 40%
Ghana MTN 25%
Togo Togocel 25%

5 comments to SMS Interconnect Fees

  • Andrew

    Isn’t it surprising how many times MTN appears in this collection of ethically challenged companies? well, no, it actually isn’t.

  • Barrie

    So what’s the work around? The history of modern communication technology has always been the user finding a work-around (eventually) and putting the offending company out of business, or at least significantly hurting them.

    These greedy mobile networks surely know this and are milking us for all they can while they can.

    Bring on the new pioneers, the mavericks and the modern freedom fighters. Let’s have that work around sooner than later…

  • Safaricom in Kenys has maintained its huge market share by ‘locking in’ subscribers BUT I also blame subscribers who idiotically dont change their providers… I moved… & slashed my calling costs at least 35%

  • zinod

    Hi Steve,
    Learning a lot from your comments.
    Any idea what the Interconnect markup in Ethiopia is approximately?
    Thanks

  • Steve Song

    Hi Zinod, Ethiopia has no interconnect fees because there is only one state-run mobile operator. There is no one for them to interconnect with.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>