Tag Archive for 'undersea fibre'

Seacom Sets Date, Reveals Pricing

Seacom has emerged as a clear front runner in the African undersea cable stakes. They are the first initiative to declare a completion date, 17 June 2009 (after which cable company Tyco will incur performance penalties). More impressively they have revealed their wholesale pricing scheme which looks like this:

According to mybroadband.co.za:

The company will have a four tiered bandwidth pricing approach where bandwidth prices for larger products, in this case STM-64, STM-16 and STM-4 connections, are sold at reduced rates to the standard STM-1 connection.

Their price for an STM-1 connection however sets a roof for the resale of bandwidth by larger bulk-bandwidth buyers thereby ensuring that smaller players receive a competitive rate.

The price for an STM-64 connection, supplying 9.6 Gbps of bandwidth, is $ 1 663 875 or R 267-00 per Mbps per month. The price per Mbps per month for a STM-1 (155 Mbps) service is R 673-00 while a STM-4 (600 Mbps) connection costs R 575-00 and a STM-16 (2.5 Gbps) service will cost R 435-00.

For the uninitiated, an STM-1 (also known as OC-3) equates to a capacity of 155.52 Mbps. STM-4 (or OC-12) is 622.08 Mbps, STM-16 (or OC-48) is 2.488 Gbps, and finally STM-64 (or OC-192) is 10 Gbps. Here is a handy list of line speeds.

Contrast this with the best VSAT price that the Partnership for Higher Education in Africa has been able to negotiate on behalf of African universities of about $2400 dollars Mbps per month for an entire transponder, which was itself a huge drop from an average of $15000 dollars per Mbps that many universities were paying prior to this. As little as 2 years ago TENET were paying Telkom $4000 per Mbps per month for its access to SAT3. ResearchICTAFrica report in their Sector Performance Review of South African telecoms that in a cross-country comparison, Telkom have been found to be charging up to 800% more than their counterparts in other countries for access to SAT3.

All that to say that Seacom and the other undersea fibre initiatives are bringing a tectonic shift in competition and pricing for Internet access to the region. Standby for significant knock-on effects in the telecommunications industry in general. I have a particular soft spot for Seacom as they have embraced Research and Education networking for African universities as part of their corporate social responsibility program offering below-cost access for African universities. This is surely caressing the hand that feeds! Right-on Seacom!

African Undersea Cables - Map

African Undersea CablesIn the spirit of the previous post consolidating information on African undersea cables, I compiled the image at the right to create a consolidated picture of existing and future cable initiatives around the continent. The relative cable sizes are roughly to scale according to the advertised capacity of the cables. There is certainly a contrast between the various initiatives.

Notable absences here are the Uhurunet and Infraco initiatives, not to mention Flag’s Next-Generation-Network or Main One. If anyone has maps of proposed routes for these initiatives, I would love to hear about it. I also have this map in an SVG file in which all the elements are scalable vector graphics, ideal for editing or adding to. You’ll have to post a comment or email me to ask for though as there appears to be a bug in the file uploading on the blog.

Note: the most up-to-date version of this map can be found at http://manypossibilities.net/african-undersea-cables.

African Undersea Cables

Mostly in order to keep them all straight in my head, I have compiled a list of African undersea cable initiatives and their features, investors, etc.

Seacom EASSy TEAMs Infraco/AWCC IWTGC
Cost (USD)
650 million 265 million 82 million 2 billion? 865 million
Length 13,700km 10,000km 4,500 km 13,000 km 14,000 km
Capacity
1.28 terabits/s 640 gigabit/s 40 gigabit/s 3.84 terabits/s 2.5 terabits / s?
Completion
June 2009 2009 April 2009 2010 Q4 2010
Ownership
USA 25%
SA 50%
Kenya 25%
African
Telecom
Operators 90%
Kenya Gov 20%
Private Investors 65%
UAE Eitelsat 15%
Infraco 26%
Private Investors 74%
US 100%?
Items in red have been updated. Last update: 9 May 2008

Investor detail:

Seacom (http://www.seacom.mu)

Industrial Promotion Services (25%), an arm of the Aga Khan Fund for Economic Development (USD 75 million)
(Kenya - founded by Prince Karim Aga Khan IV of Pakistan)

VenFin Limited (25%) - USD 75 million)

Herakles Telecom LLC (backed by Blackstone) (25%), New York-based lead company, no website (USD 75 million)

Convergence Partners (12,5%) - USD 37.5 million

Shanduka Group (12.5%) - USD 37.5 million

EASSy (http://www.eassy.org/)

EASSy is 90% African owned although that ownership is underwritten by a substantial investment by Development Financial Institutions (DFIs) including World Bank/IFC, EIB, AfDB, AFD, and DfW. Total DFI investment is apparently $70.7 million, with $18.2 million coming from IFC, 14.5 million from AfDB. This is a smaller amount than the originally advertised $120 million investment from DFIs.

South African investors in EASSY include Telkom South Africa ($18.9 million) , Neotel, and MTN.

There are 26 telco operators in total invested in EASSy.

An SPV created to facilitate. open access will be the biggest shareholder, with 46%.

In Jan 2008, VSNL announced an investment in EASSy

Teams

Currently, 85 per cent of the project is owned by the Government of Kenya and the rest by Etisalaat of the United Arab Emirates. The Gov’t of Kenya is looking for local investment in the cable. According to Business Day, Safaricom is a likely shareholder at 30 per cent with the government retaining a 20 per cent stake. The rest is up for investment by regional operators.

Uhurunet / Infraco

African telecom operators (45%), Nepad (30%), International investors (25%)

Confirmed and rumored investors:
• 5P Holdings (US)
• International Development Office of the government of Ras Al Khaimah (an emirate in the UAE)
• Pan-African Infrastructure Development Fund (PAIDF)
• Phelps Stokes Fund (American 501 (c)(3) nonprofit
• Sheikh Saoud of Qatar (rumored)
• South African ownership: Telkom, Neotel and MTN together own 27%

IWTGC

A US company founded by African and African-American group of telecom veterans. Financial backing from West African bank and